If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result? And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discoveryįor the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js, GraphQL and MongoDB:
Mongodb compass alternative movie#
It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks.
0 kommentar(er)
