The pen dropped from his hand ere he had quite completed the work, yet, as the book stands here, it is much as he meant to leave it.
In intervals of ease during his last illness he worked at it, sometimes in bed, sometimes in his armchair: it is pleasant to think that he so enjoyed the work that its production eased and soothed many a weary hour for him, and certainly never was other than a recreation to him. The illness which ultimately, alas, ended fatally had already laid hold on him ere he had well begun the book. It was undertaken while he was yet in the prime of his strength and vigour. His boy-heroes are neither prigs nor milk-sops, but in their strength and weakness they are the stuff which ultimately makes our best citizens and fathers they are the boys who, later in life, with healthy minds in healthy bodies, have made the British Empire what it is.Ī special and pathetic interest attaches to this story of “Kilgorman,” the last that left Talbot Reed’s pen. Hence the wholesomeness of tone and the breezy freshness of his work. He sympathised with the troubles and joys, he understood the temptations, and fathomed the motives that sway and mould boy-character he had the power of depicting that side of life with infinite humour and pathos, possible only to one who could place himself sympathetically at the boys’ stand-point in life. The secret of Reed’s success in this direction was that all through life, as every one who had the privilege of knowing him can testify, he possessed in himself the healthy freshness of heart of boyhood. His heroes have always the charm of bounding, youthful energy, and youth’s invincible hopefulness, and the constant flow of good spirits which have made the boys of all time perennially interesting. He had the rare art of hitting off boy-nature, with just that spice of wickedness in it without which a boy is not a boy. His boys are of flesh and blood, such as fill our public schools, such as brighten or “make hay” of the peace of our homes. With neither of these types have Talbot Reed’s boys’ books any kinship. His books are alike removed from the old-fashioned and familiar class of boys’ stories, which, meaning well, generally baffled their own purpose by attempting to administer morality and doctrine on what Reed called the “powder-in-jam” principle-a process apt to spoil the jam, yet make “the powder” no less nauseous or, on the other hand, the class of book that dealt in thrilling adventure of the blood-curdling and “penny dreadful” order. For fourteen years he has contributed to their pleasure, and in the little library of boys’ books which left his pen he has done as much as any writer of our day to raise the standard of boys’ literature. Reed the boys of the English-speaking world have lost one of their best friends. I hope too to show what we aren’t looking at.By the death of Talbot B. The causes aren’t in our language, doctors, pharmaceutical companies or even Trump. On a separate note, none of the pieces on the opioid epidemic have addressed the causes.
I hope my poem shows my ambivalence either way. As for those who don’t want to be aligned with us, I don’t know what to tell them. To take that away would be to take everything. For many people I know, they wouldn’t want that taken from them. I think too often we take it on as our identity.
#TOBALT AUDIFY CRACK#
I don’t recall this type of thinking during the crack epidemic. People aren’t addicts, they have substance misuse disorders. This is a response to a recent opinion piece suggesting that to overcome the opioid epidemic we must change our language. “And if you are not a bird, then beware of coming to rest above an abyss.” ― Friedrich Nietzsche
0 kommentar(er)
